Showing posts with label brothel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brothel. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

'Love Ranch' Brothel Film Opens in Theatres Tomorrow

Dame Helen Mirren is returning to the big screen tomorrow week in “Love Ranch,” a movie that casts her as a madam of Nevada’s first legal brothel.

While the movie itself has been panned by a lot of critics, Mirren’s performance has been universally lauded as elevating the “soap opera” dialog into believability.

Frankly, I don’t care how awful the movie is or isn't. I love Dame Helen, and could care less what project she’s in. I also love any movie that focuses attention on legalized prostitution, something that I support more than whole-heartedly.

In addition, Dame Helen did a wonderful interview with New York Magazine, which appears below in its entirety, with a huge bonus: A photo series to promote the new movie that included two gorgeous shots of her naked in a bath tub; and two other artistic portraits. I have included them all here, which were taken by Juergen Teller, and appear in New York Magazine, Summer Guide. Dame Helen gets more beautiful with each passing year, a message that a lot of women (and men) need to learn: Real beauty is ageless.

So, sit back and enjoy a wonderful interview, or read it directly at the magazine’s website. Then, go to the theatre and support a wonderful actress, and a topic that also deserves to be supported.

Madam Helen
“I’m still the good girl who wants to be a bad girl…”
By Logan Hill

“All that getting sanctioned by authority, settling down and doing the right things—well, I can’t say it appeals much,” Helen Mirren once said to a reporter. “What I really fancy is getting a bit notorious …?”

It was 1974, and she was a 29-year-old actress teasing the journalist much as she would the press and audiences for the next 36 years. Mirren was then a rising star at the Royal Shakespeare Company—luridly dubbed “Stratford’s very own sex queen” by one paper. It was long before the authorities sanctioned her with a pile of awards (including an Oscar for The Queen), and before the Internet made her a viral phenom thanks to bodacious paparazzi shots of her cavorting in a bikini. At the age of 62. And guess what? She had it both ways: She got her notoriety and the fusty accolades.

“I am a little notorious,” Mirren remarks, still teasing. She says nearly everything with a mischievous twinkle, like a naughty teenager appending “?… in bed” to the end of every sentence. The actress, who turns 65 next month, is elegantly attired in pale rose and silver, her delicate hands (the nails tinted a matching pearlescent rose) constantly buttoning and unbuttoning her cardigan. It’s probably not meant flirtatiously, but with Mirren, every action can feel like a seduction. Perhaps it’s the small, black Native American tattoo on her left hand (the result, she says, of a wild, drunken night in Minnesota), her subtle finger to propriety. “It’s weird when your life becomes vintage, like a period movie,” she says half-seriously. “I’m getting less notorious as I get older. People forget that I ever was.”

Her latest role, not to mention the Juergen Teller photos attending this article, should help remind everyone. After a raft of prestigious parts and three Oscar nominations in the last decade, Mirren signed up to play Grace Botempo, the madam of a booming seventies Reno whorehouse in her husband Taylor Hackford’s film Love Ranch, opening June 30. (The film, based on Nevada’s real Mustang Ranch, is scripted and produced by New York contributing editor Mark Jacobson.) For years, Hackford, whom she married in 1997, has asked her to play smaller parts in his films. “And I said ‘Oh, for God’s sake! Of course I’m not going to do that!’?” says Mirren. “They were never interesting enough parts, and I wasn’t going to do it just because he was directing it.”

Interesting is probably underselling Grace. Diagnosed with cancer and frustrated with an epically sleazy husband (Joe Pesci), Mirren’s madam begins a hot love affair with a beefy boxer 30 years her junior, played with abundant smolder by Spanish newcomer Sergio Peris-Mencheta. “He’s got a fabulous big-animal thing in that sort of raw, brutish, ugly-beautiful way,” says Mirren, who shares a steamy, and, because it’s her, entirely plausible love scene with Peris-Mencheta. In addition, she makes dick jokes, stomps on the throat of a misbehaving prostitute, and presides over the brothel with such swagger that Pesci shouts, “Who do ya think you are, the queen of fuckin’ England?” Well, yes.

In another of her earliest interviews, Mirren was quoted as saying, “I’m a would-be rebel—the good girl who’d like to be a bad one.” She says she continues, at heart, to be the good Catholic schoolgirl named Ilyena Vasilievna Mironov, who grew up in Essex, England, with a Russian father and an English mother. “It’s true! I haven’t grown out of that, have I?” she says, laughing. “I’m still the good girl who wants to be a bad girl. But I’ll never make it as a bad girl … I’m not a prude or a moralist and I never have been, but I’m too fearful, too much of a wimp, really.” When her husband tried to convince her to spend a night at the Mustang Ranch, Mirren refused. “I said, ‘Read my lips: I’m not going to spend a night in a brothel.’?” In the end, she dispensed with research and simply took direction. “It’s amazing how quickly you get into dildos everywhere and pink-feather handcuffs. Within an hour you’re completely used to it.”

Mirren believes that brothels should be legalized because its safer for the sex workers. But she’s also loathe to romanticize working girls: “Susan Austin [the Mustang Ranch’s real madam] said you had to be tough, because maybe you do have 25 psychotic whores. A lot of them come from very dysfunctional backgrounds, and women together like that can be very dangerous.”

There’s the old joke about actors prostituting themselves for their work, but for Mirren, who’s revealed so much of herself (metaphorically and otherwise), and who has often spoken out about the way women get eaten up by the entertainment industry, it’s a complex metaphor. “The girls who work in the sex industry, they put themselves out of their bodies. An actor does sort of the opposite,” says Mirren, who talks about acting as giving every intimacy—emotional and physical—except actual intercourse. “People say ‘Oh, you play someone else.’ I’m always playing myself. You can only do it by going into yourself, in the deepest, most terrifying way. Not to say I haven’t ever prostituted myself quite often and happily. But in my heart it’s very serious.”

Mirren, who began as a devoted stage actress, schooled in Chekhov and Shakespeare, quickly learned to use her sexuality to her advantage. “Especially when you’re younger and you’re a female, you’re being judged physically as much as for everything else,” she says. “And when you’re a serious actress like I was … I’ve always taken it very seriously at that level.”

Of her scandalous early roles in 1969’s Age of Consent (when she stripped as the teenage muse of an older painter) or Gore Vidal and Bob Guccione’s nutty art-porn Caligula (1979), Mirren says she had a plan. “A lot of it is plain, old-fashioned practicality. I wanted to work,” she says. “When I did Caligula, for example, I hadn’t really done movies.” And besides, she adds, “I much prefer overt sexuality to sleazy, vulgar prurience.”

As Mirren explains it, she struggled to get a handle on her own sexuality in order to use its power to accomplish her ambitions. “The Playboy Mansion, coke, and the rise of all that—Guccione and Hefner always pushed it as liberation, but it didn’t seem like that to me,” she says. “That was women obeying the sexualized form created by men—though maybe we always do that, because we want to be attractive. But I was kind of a trailblazer because I demanded to do it my own way. I’d say, ‘I’m not having it put on me by someone else.’ I didn’t want to be the sort of puritanical good girl with a little white collar who says, ‘Don’t shag until you get married.’?”

Now, her reputation secure, Mirren’s enjoying the results of her efforts. “I’m thrilled young girls are claiming their sexuality for themselves,” she says. “I love bold women: Madonna and Scarlett Johansson—sexy and gorgeous, but not only that. And Miley Cyrus—fantastic! And Lady Gaga. I love the way she’s elevated pop to performance art, or dragged performance art down to pop, or maybe made a wonderful amalgam of the two.”

With her coy smile, Mirren looks like the conspiring queen who’s usurped the throne, securing the kingdom for her heirs: “My girls: Miley, Scarlett, Lady Gaga. My team … Yes.”

------

[Photo Above: In this film publicity image released by E1 Entertainment, from left, Niki J. Crawford portrays Tawny, Scout Taylor-Compton portrays Christina, Gina Gershon portrays Irene, Melora Walters portrays Janelle, Elise Neal portrays Alana, Emily Rios portrays Muneca, Bai Ling portrays Samantha and Helen Mirren portrays Grace Bontempo in a scene from "Love Ranch."]

Review
By Jake Coyle
(Note: Contains Spoilers!)

(Dame) Helen Mirren playing a Madame is such fitting casting that it's almost too much. For an actress who has made sexuality her life's subtext, it's as winking as Clint Eastwood playing a gun salesman or Dustin Hoffman a pool cleaner.

But Joe Pesci, who plays her husband and business partner, Charlie "Good Times" Bontempo, has the coyest line in "Love Ranch" — an allusion to Mirren's Oscar-winning performance in "The Queen."

"Who do ya think you are? The queen of ... England?" he asks, somehow restraining a look into the camera.

So the question is, what's an actress of Mirren's quality doing in "Love Ranch," a supermarket romance novel of a movie? The answer: a favor.

Mirren's husband, Taylor Hackford, directs "Love Ranch." It's the first time they've worked together since they met while making 1985's "White Nights." (Hackford has since directed "Devil's Advocate" and "Ray," his previous, Oscar-winning film.)

"Love Ranch" is loosely based on Joe and Sally Conforte, the famed brothel owners whose Mustang Ranch in Reno found national attention in the '70s. Joe Conforte brought heavyweight fighter Oscar Bonavena to the ranch, where Bonavena supposedly became involved with Sally and was eventually shot dead in 1976.

The film is written by magazine journalist Mark Jacobson, whose inflated article on gangster Frank Lucas was the basis for "American Gangster." Jacobson's script for "Love Ranch," set in the mid-'70s, centres on the romance that develops between Grace Bontempo (Mirren) and the visiting Argentine boxer Armando Bruza (newcomer Sergio Peris-Mencheta).

As Charlie, Pesci is only a step or two removed from "Casino" territory. Wearing a bolo tie and an inconsistent Southern accent, Pesci is trying to build their lucrative brothel into a larger enterprise. Calling everyone "sugar," he takes his turns with the ranch's girls, making no attempt to hide his infidelity.

Grace, weary from a lifetime running Nevada brothels, tells him: "I'm not the great visionary like you. I'm just down here with the nuts and bolts."

She keeps the books and the girls in order. In perhaps her finest scene, she quickly and ruthlessly settles a squabble between two prostitutes, flipping one to the ground with her cane and keeping her there with her boot on the girl's throat.

Grace keeps secret a cancer diagnosis (from the terribly named Dr. Smathers) that she has six months to live. But when the rugged, charismatic Armando arrives, Grace is reluctantly stirred, and the two soon begin — against Grace's nature — caring deeply for each other.

And this is where "Love Ranch" looses its footing most obviously. A movie with prostitutes, guns, boxing and Reno is crying out for the film noir treatment. Along with neon signs in the desert, give us some terse dialogue and some fatalism.

Instead, the dressing for "Love Ranch" is a soap opera romance.

With a Christian group and the IRS circling the brothel, Pesci — as always — seems ready to explode. You find yourself surprised that it takes the combustible actor as long as it does to let loose.

Wasted in thin bit parts are fine actors like Gina Gershon (as a prostitute), Bryan Cranston (as a dirty politician) and Wendell Pierce (as a representative for Muhammad Ali).

Mirren does her best with the soapy material, but the better recent reminder of her early sex-symbol "Caligula" days was her performance as Sofya Tolstoy in last year's "The Last Station." Who knew Russian lit was sexier than Reno pulp?

"Love Ranch," an E1 Entertainment and Aramid Entertainment Fund Limited release, is rated R for sexual content, pervasive language and some violence. Running time: 118 minutes. One and a half stars out of four.

— The Curator

Friday, November 13, 2009

Spitzer Lectures On...Wait for it...ETHICS IN GOVERNMENT?!!


(This one really, really does challenge the incredulity-meter folks!)

Disgraced ex-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer addressed a packed hall yesterday at a Harvard ethics center amid criticism that his hooker-hiring past made him an unfit choice to teach students about corruption. (Ya think?)

(FYI: The ONLY one with any sense in this whole mess is the manager of the brothel where Spitzer hired “call girls.” She basically said it was obscene to pay him to discuss this issue after his sorted past.)

Kristin Davis, a former madam who once lined Spitzer up with high-priced ladies of the night, yesterday was offering students and faculty members $100 to ask the infamous, “Client No. 9” Spitzer about his rationale for participating in an illegal prostitution racket.

“Are we teaching Harvard students how to ethically break laws while pretending to uphold them?” a bitter Davis wrote on her Web site yesterday.

The madam of the prostitution ring that was broken by the FBI had said she sent a protest letter to the Harvard center’s director, Prof. Lawrence Lessig at The Edmond J. Safra Foundation Center for Ethics. In the letter, Davis questioned how Spitzer could be welcomed, while she is serving five years of probation, cannot leave New York during that time, and must register as a sex offender, “for pleading guilty to providing him with call-girls.”

(Me thinks there could be a bit of a double standard at work here – but no, not in OUR society!)

Davis, who writes a blog calling herself, “The Manhattan Madam,’’ said in the letter that, “I deplore hypocrisy and abhor public officials who use their power to commit and cover up their own crimes and to lie and deceive the same public they have promised to protect.’’ (Bravo, m’dear!)

Lessig, who is also a professor at Harvard Law School, said in a statement and to the crowd yesterday that he does not condone Spitzer’s past, but said the former governor was invited to speak at a lecture focusing on finances, “because he has an extraordinary breadth of experience as both a governor and prosecutor involving institutional corruption issues in the financial sector."

Davis said she can't imagine a less qualified speaker.

"I am greatly intrigued as to what Mr. Spitzer could contribute to an ethical discussion when, as [governor], he broke numerous laws for which he has yet to be punished," Davis wrote to Lessig.

"As attorney general, he went around arresting and making examples out of the same escort agencies he was frequenting."

Calling Spitzer a "man without ethics," Davis listed seven reasons why Harvard should reconsider. Among other things, she asked if it was "ethical" to hire a hooker using a fake name or lie about shady campaign loans.

Lessig denied receiving the letter from Davis, but that the invitation to speak at Harvard was unrelated to the actions that forced Spitzer to resign. Spitzer was not giving "a lecture on ethics," Lessig said.

“There should not be any doubt about the behavior,’’ he said. “It was wrong – to himself, to his family, and to supporters. But we’re not asking him to give theories on personal ethical behavior,” Lessig said. (Too bad he didn’t mention that Spitzer also wronged the citizens of NY by breaking the law.)

"He has instead been invited to speak as part of a series on the topic of 'institutional corruption'," the professor said. “Governor Spitzer was invited to speak, as part of the lab’s lectures on the question of institutional corruption, because he has an extraordinary breadth of experience as both a governor and prosecutor involving institutional corruption issues in the financial sector.”

SPRITZ-HER (Sorry, couldn't resist), who resigned as New York’s governor in March 2008 after getting caught having paid flings with Davis’ prostitutes, delivered a lecture titled, “What Should Be the Rationale for Government Participation in the Market?” to a rapt and largely sympathetic audience at the Safra Foundation Center for Ethics.

(Sadly, not one attendee took Davis up on her $100 question offer.)

Before the lecture, Spitzer, who walked to the event with his daughter, Alyssa, a Harvard undergraduate, was asked by the Herald whether he saw any irony in giving a lecture on ethics given his own scandalous past.

“I let people form their own judgments,” Spitzer responded. (Are you FUCKING kidding me?)

During a question-and-answer period after the lecture, one student – in the only reference to the prostitution scandal – asked Spitzer if he thought there was a Wall Street conspiracy to expose him and bring him down. Spitzer rejected the notion, saying what he did was “wrong,” and that he resigned from office because it was, “the right thing to do.”

Davis said yesterday on her blog that Harvard’s invitation to Spitzer “boggles the mind.” She also vowed to enter any political race if Spitzer decides to seek a statewide office next year in New York.

(There has been recent speculation that Spitzer will indeed go for it again – sorry, I mean politics. Spitzer has clearly been trying to remake himself of late. The so-called "Sheriff of Wall Street" has been lecturing on law and public policy at City College and has opined about the economy on TV. By the way, if I lived in NY, Davis would get my vote!)

Before the lecture, students outside Harvard’s Emerson Hall were privately making jokes about Spitzer speaking at the ethics forum, but the Harvard Law School alum also had his share of supporters.

Alex Meletakos, 19, a freshman majoring in economics, said he sees nothing wrong with Spitzer speaking at Harvard, but “it’s kind of funny. He was involved in an ethical scandal, and now he’s giving a lecture on ethical standards. We’ll see how it goes.”

But, there were no protests, or outbursts during the lecture. Spitzer stuck to the basics of his speech: government’s role in enforcing transparency and integrity in the financial markets.

The scores of people in attendance at Harvard University yesterday did pepper the former governor with questions about pubic policy on the open market and the extent to which government should get involved in the private sector.

During the lecture, Spitzer, who gained a reputation as an arch-enemy of Wall Street bigshots when he was attorney general in New York, criticized current government officials, including Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and ex-Harvard president Larry Summers, now a top White House economic adviser, for not moving aggressively enough to force changes on Wall Street.

Spitzer said taxpayers have been harmed and policymakers missed a great opportunity to leverage the financial crisis into real change.

Spitzer, himself a Harvard graduate, has spoken at the university before, and has had a series of articles published recently describing the role government should play in monitoring financial institutions.

Those in attendance, some who acknowledged they attended the event because of the hype beforehand, said Spitzer drew a clear line between personal ethics and public policy. He spoke of government’s failures to foresee the scandals that led to the economy’s collapse, and the role government should play now.

“I thought it was extremely valuable,’’ said Tara Jayaratnam, a student at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. She said society tends to hold public officials to high standards, often overseeing the expertise they may be able to bring to a debate. (Sorry, but he has forfeited any right to bring anything to a publicly sanctioned debate. There MUST be repercussions to politicians who commit crimes.)

“It was good he came, and I’m glad Harvard had the courage to bring him, because we had to hear that voice,’’ she said.


(FYI: I believe in, and strongly support, legalizing prostitution in the US. But, since there are laws prohibiting it, I also firmly believe that all public officials have a moral and ETHICAL duty to abide by that law; especially a former attorney general who prosecuted public officials for doing exactly as he has done in patronizing prostitution, not to mention trying to prosecute escort services. The issue here is NOT prostitution, but hypocrisy and deceipt, and expecting at least a MINIMAL level of integrity in government — The Curator.)